Cite this article as:

Solovyova E. A. Emotional and Evaluative Function of Metaphor in the Speech of French Soldiers During the First World War. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2019-19-1-7-10

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Linguistics
UDC: 
811.133.1’276’373.612.2
Language: 
Russian

Emotional and Evaluative Function of Metaphor in the Speech of French Soldiers During the First World War

The article explores the emotional and evaluative function of metaphor actualizing the military realia in the speech practices of French soldiers in the early twentieth century. The author shows that the use of metaphors in professional communication is largely conditioned by the current psychological and extra-linguistic context and by the connotative meaning of the linguistic sign as well.

Authors: 
Solovyova
Evgeniya
A.
,
Southern Federal University
,
Russia, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Bolshaya Sadovaya street, 105/42
,
e_rossignol@mail.ru
Key words: 
metaphor, military vocabulary, professional communication, argot poilu, military discourse, the First World War
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2019-19-1-7-10
Literature
  1. Abel M. Humor, stress, and coping strategies // Humor : International Journal of Humor Research. 2002. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 366.
  2. Barbusse H. Le Feu (Journal d’une Escouade). Paris : E. Flammarion, 1917.
  3. Cassagne J.-M. Le grand dictionnaire de l’argot militaire. Paris : Éd. LBM, 2007.
  4. Cochet F., Porte R. Dictionnaire de la Grande Guerre : 1914–1918. Paris : R. Laffont, 2008. P. 102.
  5. Contes véridiques des tranchées, 1914–1915. Paris : Lemerre, 1915.
  6. Ervas F., Gola E., Rossi M. G. Metaphors and emotions as framing strategies in argumentation // CEUR-Workshop Proceedings. 2015. Vol. 1419. P. 645–650.
  7. Esnault G. Le poilu tel qu’il se parle. Paris : Bossard, 1919.
  8. Frezza G. Metaphor : the good argument in science communication // Rivista Italiana di Filosofi a del Linguaggio. 2016. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 21–33.
  9. Galopin A. Les Poilus de la 9e. Paris : Albin Michel, 1915.
  10. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language // The Journal of Philosophy. 1980. Vol. 77, № 8. P. 453–486.
  11. Saber A. Métaphore et culture professionnelle chez les militaires américains // Cahiers du CIEL. 2000–2003. P. 189. URL: http://www.eila.univ-paris-diderot.fr/recherche/clillac/ciel/cahiers/200... (дата обращения: 27.10.2016).
  12. The Essential Peirce : Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 2 : 1893–1913 / ed. by the Peirce edition Project. Bloomimgton ; Indeapolis : Indiana University Press, 1998. P. 409.
  13. Zenkine S. Connotation et quiproquo (quelques considerations à partir des Mythologies de Roland Barthes) //Le malentendu dans tous ses états. 2016. № 44. P. 162.
  14. Балашова Л. Русская метафора : прошлое, настоящее, будущее. М. : Языки славянской культуры, 2014.
  15. Уланов А. Русский военный дискурс XIX – начала XX века : структура, специфика эволюция : дис. … д-ра филол. наук. Омск, 2014.
  16. Шаховской В. Когнитивная матрица эмоционально-коммуникативной личности // Вестн. РУДН. Сер. Лингвистика. 2018. Т. 22, № 1. С. 54–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-54-79.
Full Text (PDF): 
2._soloveva.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ