Cite this article as:

Zakharov K. M. On the problem of cyclization of “Little Tragedies” by A. S. Pushkin. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 301-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2022-22-3-301-305


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
821.161.1.09-2+929Пушкин
Language: 
Russian

On the problem of cyclization of “Little Tragedies” by A. S. Pushkin

The article proposes a new version of the cycle-forming organization of “Little Tragedies” by A. S. Pushkin, after a brief excursion through the already existing cycle-forming concepts of a group of scenes and plays united in Russian culture under the non-author’s general name “Little Tragedies”. The intra-textual situation of unexpected, spontaneous inspiration of the central characters of the plays included in the cycle is put forward as a binding compositional element. It is this recurring element that accompanies either the beginning of a plot action or, on the contrary, its climax. Walsingham (A Feast in Time of Plague) and Mozart (Mozart and Salieri) are liable to sudden inspiration (for Walsingham, this comes as a surprise, but Mozart is so surprised by the result that he hurries to demonstrate the composition to his “friend” Salieri, unwittingly provoking the envier to a crime). The “improviser” of the love song is Don Guan (The Stone Guest), who spoke to Donna Anna and set out on the path of his inevitable death. The moment of spontaneous inspiration becomes for all three characters a harbinger of the end, however, for Walsingham it is so far hypothetical. The Baron (The Miserly Knight), who is strikingly diff erent from the other three protagonists, also experiences such a moment, spontaneously deciding to arrange a “feast” for himself alone with his wealth. At this moment, he returns to the thought of his heir, which will push him to slander and death. In the conclusion of the article, a parallel is carefully drawn between the mood of the biographical author, who enthusiastically indulged in the work, and the state of the heroes of his plays, who unwittingly “inherited” from their creator the same moment of being intoxicated with sudden inspiration.

Literature

1. Бонди С. М. Драматические произведения Пушкина // Пушкин А. С. Собр. соч. : в 10 т. Т. 4. М. : Гослитиздат, 1960. С. 553–566.

2. Гаркави А. М. «Маленькие трагедии» Пушкина как драматургический цикл : композиция в связи с жанром и художественным методом // Балтийский филологический курьер. 2003. № 3. С. 189–199.

3. Таборисская Е. М. «Маленькие трагедии» Пушкина как цикл (некоторые аспекты поэтики) // Пушкинский сборник : сб. науч. тр. / ред. Е. А. Маймин. Л. : ЛГПИ, 1977. С. 139–144.

4. Шевырев С. П. Сочинения Александра Пушкина // Москвитянин. 1841. Ч. 5. № 9. Критика. С. 236–270.

5. Лотман Ю. М. Символ – «ген сюжета» // Лотман Ю. М. Семиосфера : Культура и взрыв ; Внутри мыслящих миров ; Статьи. Исследования. Заметки (1968–1992). СПб. : Искусство-СПБ, 2000. С. 221–240.

6. Пушкин А. С. Письмо Плетневу П. А., 9 декабря 1830 г. Москва // Пушкин А. С. Полн. собр. соч. : в 16 т. Т. 14. М. ; Л. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1941. С. 133.

7. Пушкин А. С. Полн. собр. соч. : в 16 т. Т. 7. М. ; Л. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1935. 724 с.

8. Wilson J. The city of the plague, and other poems. Edinburgh : Printed by James Ballantyne and Co. P. 50. URL: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433074914270&view=1up&seq=9... (дата обращения: 12.01.2022).

9. Алексеев М. П. Комментарий к «Моцарту и Сальери» // Пушкин А. С. Полн. собр. соч. : в 16 т. Т. 7. М. ; Л. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1935. С. 523–546.

10. Пушкин А. С. Письмо Погодину М. П., 15–20 мая 1830 г. Москва // Пушкин А. С. Полн. собр. соч. : в 16 т. Т. 14. М. ; Л. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1941. С. 92.

Generator XML for DOAJ